Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @ignaloidas@not.acu.lt
Blurry Moon@sun@shitposter.world (2026-09-14 22:38:38)
@ignaloidas @taylan doesn't this preclude women only spaces completely, no matter how you define woman
---Reply---
Ignas Kiela@ignaloidas@not.acu.lt (2026-09-14 22:45:45)
@sun@shitposter.world @taylan@fedi.feministwiki.org yes, and I mean it's kinda intentional?

I don't see any value in women-only spaces, just like I don't see any value in men-only spaces or trans-only spaces

If you only/mostly socialize with people that have a certain label, you're building stereotypes and disdain in your mind for people who don't have that label. E.g. see support for migration control vs. number of migrants in Germany - the more people can interact with others, the less hatred there is for them

I'm quite sure that I could show that any argument for women-only spaces can be shown to be parallel to an argument for a racially segregated space

---Replies---

Blurry Moon@sun@shitposter.world (2026-09-14 22:48:02)
@ignaloidas @taylan I don't know what my opinion on it is tbh, seems like there are benefits to either way. However, you cannot side with feminists and be against women-only spaces, because almost all feminists, and certainly all feminists connected to notable organized feminist movements, completely disagree with you on this. severely.