Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @feld@friedcheese.us
Gabriel@gabriel@mstdn.starnix.network (2026-08-29 05:33:44)
@feld 


These people were likely doomed unless they could somehow completely avoid ever being exposed to the virus.


This is such a weird assertion when the vaccine was rolled out a whole year after the virus and basically all the "essential workers" still had regular contact with the public. Nobody tested for this but I would bet money many people hurt by the shots would show evidence of having at least a variant in their system.

Unless we're believing that SARS-COV-2 is somehow magic and didn't actually do anything until late 2021.
@hazlin
---Reply---
Only 3 Easy Payments of $19.95@feld@friedcheese.us (2026-08-29 05:43:36)
@gabriel @hazlin the data we have actually shows the e.g., cardiac events were less common in people who took the vaccine

---Replies---

Gabriel@gabriel@mstdn.starnix.network (2026-08-29 06:00:47)
@feld 
Correlation isn't causation and all that. 
One of the signs the data was cooked was that the data also showed that the shot reduced literally every kind of death (including accidents and murder) which basically means some "healthy user bias" is baked in at minimum. 

Also, how many shots just one or the whole recommended schedule? Cause that matters too. 

But all that is irrelevant because you're asserting that for every case the virus must be more lethal than the shot and that doesn't account for a great many things. At minimum I think it's basically impossible for a vast majority of people to not have caught a virus/variant by 2021 given how lockdowns were actually done even here in Ontario, which was one of the more serious jurisdictions.

Some go as far as to argue the whole virus was a charade. In hindsight it's actually pretty hard to rule that out when you consider the fact that the data is making that assertion. 

@hazlin