Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @mitchconner@clubcyberia.co
Blurry Moon@sun@shitposter.world (2026-07-22 15:00:34)
@mitchconner @Humpleupagus @adequate @Wiz RLM will say something is okayish and then a year later pan it in asides on other reviews, so that's how they do things. But they both said they really liked it so it doesn't apply. They won't call out obvious bullshit but kidn of like mushroom soup says, a movie with stupid DEI shit in it can sometimes still be good
---Reply---
Thomas Roiloup@thomasroiloup@shitposter.world (2026-07-22 16:08:47)
@sun @mitchconner @Humpleupagus @Wiz @adequate RLM's priority is about whether it's well made, competent, coherent, structured, engaging, regardless of the level of brainwashing in it that is almost bog standard in hollyqueird.  There are a lot of very clearly dogshit insane stupid movies that they've praised for various reasons, and I think a lot of it is the critic's disease, when you see almost every movie that comes out, anything that doesn't completely suck and isn't riddled with incompetence and mistakes and bad editing and so on, the critic will enjoy more because they see too much other stuff to compare it to.

---Replies---

Blurry Moon@sun@shitposter.world (2026-07-22 16:16:54)
@thomasroiloup @Humpleupagus @Wiz @adequate @mitchconner they just don't want to wade into the culture wars because that's not the audience they want, which is smart because whether someone is right or wrong about woke, the channels that focus on that are cancer