Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @sun@shitposter.world
jonny (nonvenomous)@jonny@neuromatch.social (2026-07-24 02:44:41)
@sun
@phnt
What's cool about literacy is that either of you could actually read the thing you're responding to if you wanted
---Reply---
Phantasm@phnt@fluffytail.org (2026-07-24 03:34:49)
@jonny @sun I've read the whole blogpost hours before even replying here. There is nothing much to talk about as it mostly is fluff I've read and heard tens of times already with unfortunate facts sprinkled in.

The only point worth talking about is right at the end and that is their plans of enforcing said policy. And as I've expected, unless a project is visibly mostly vibecoded, the enforcement will come down to vibes. Which I expected as the policy isn't enforceable without being at least somewhat subjective. That said, I'm personally not a fan of rules/policies that cannot be enforced with near 100% accuracy. But it is their non-profit, their forge hosting, they are free to do whatever the members want.

At least the policy is defined and not completely vague unlike their blanket "crypto related projects" ban they even lie about in the banner that pops up when you are logged in today. If you wanted my opinion on this whole situation, that is it. Nothing more, nothing less. I have no comment on the part you quoted, simply because I mostly do not care about what it talks about.

---Replies---

Blurry Moon@sun@shitposter.world (2026-07-24 08:15:41)
@phnt @jonny yeah I read it and I read the entire crypto discussion going back three years, where they asked for input, and when they got it they shut down discussion and lied that they got threatened.