Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @jonny@neuromatch.social
Blurry Moon@sun@shitposter.world (2026-07-23 21:18:29)
@jonny @Codeberg > sharing the result of an prompt and calling it "libre software" does not make the world a better place. 

the end user decides if it does, not codeberg by fiat
---Reply---
Phantasm@phnt@fluffytail.org (2026-07-23 21:25:21)
@sun @jonny @Codeberg Especially in the case of "add feature X to project Y that was refused with: No use case/We don't do that." If the project doesn't want it, might as well fork it, get an LLM to do most of the work and be done with it. Not like the changes will get upstreamed anyway, so code quality doesn't matter as much for a personal fork.

This case is where the "making a better world" argument falls apart, I get my feature I want and everyone else gets nothing (likely not even the patches).

---Replies---

Blurry Moon@sun@shitposter.world (2026-07-23 21:31:51)
@phnt @jonny @Codeberg people can just admit they don't want llms no matter what. it will generate less unwanted discussion because let's be honest it's not actually a discussion