Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @mischievoustomato@0.5dollah.click
SuperDicq@SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo (2026-10-03 04:39:02)
@mischievoustomato@0.5dollah.click @steph@fedi.steph.tools @sun@shitposter.world If with "i like proprietary software" you mean that you enjoy the software itself you would likely still agree with me that the software would be better if it had a free license so you could actually modify it and share it with people.

But if with "i like proprietary software" you mean you enjoy the restrictions put upon you than you might just be a masochist.
---Reply---
Sex Tips: Cunnilingus Tutorial📱@mischievoustomato@0.5dollah.click (2026-10-03 04:40:42)
@SuperDicq @steph @sun it could potentially be better yes if the code was modifiable, and i had llms. I have been patching a lot of software to fix things or adapt things for myself (which is very easy with llms and something just too annoying to do without) and it's cool. But even with LLMs, I'd rather not have to do this. One of the driving forces towards me moving to the Apple ecosystem. FOSS programs largely suck!

---Replies---

SuperDicq@SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo (2026-10-03 04:52:29)
@mischievoustomato@0.5dollah.click @steph@fedi.steph.tools @sun@shitposter.world Always remember that free software doesn't suck because it is free. It sucks because they are made by a ragtag group of virgins in their basement without billions of dollars of funding.

The fact that free software can usually do 99% of things with a little frustration sometimes that you can do with proprietary while only using 0.0000000001% of the budget is proves how awfully inefficient proprietary software development is.