Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @Sui@decayable.ink
ռօȶ ֆʊɨ ʄօʀ աօʀӄ@Sui@decayable.ink (2026-07-23 22:36:38)
> The defense contends that causing "anger, alarm, or resentment"—the standard cited in the disorderly conduct statute—is insufficient to criminalize speech under the First Amendment.

This just keeps getting worse the more I look into it lmfao, I hear speech that causes me all three of those on a daily fucking basis. So fucking what? All three are subjective as fuck and far more importantly there is no way in hell that could ever be applied equally to everyone. Fucking christmas music (especially before december) is "fighting words" and illegal under that vague a justification for killing 1A. The media's entire business model is literally causing anger/alarm/resentment on an hourly basis ffs.
---Reply---
Blurry Moon@sun@shitposter.world (2026-07-23 22:59:41)
@Sui @Shadowman311 racial epithets as fightinf words has already gone all the way to the Supreme Court and they’re not.