Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @sun@shitposter.world
Blurry Moon@sun@shitposter.world (2026-09-18 14:20:56)
@toiletpaper here's what I've found so far:

racism: it will refuse but if you're clever in framing, and setting up your wording in a way that indirectly references stuff, it sometimes can be totally jailbroken and just tell you what it already knows about statistics and inferences you can clearly draw from those statistics (EXCEPTION: it is aggressively preventing touching racist WORDS.)
same for sexism
the guardrails are immediate but kind of primitive for talking about Israel and Zionism, it definitely has been trained to "both sides" every argument but it's not smart enough to detect what you're doing in some cases. I don't think they care or understand but they've defensively added guardrails to just deal with normal idiots both sidesing everything.
anything touching rape or child sexual abuse (this came up while discussing storytelling and historic literature) it absolutely will not touch it. I don't think this is "political" I think even if discussing it is relevant for social reasons they simply can't as a business tolerate the failure case where their product starts producing child pornography.
---Reply---
Blurry Moon@sun@shitposter.world (2026-09-18 14:22:33)
@toiletpaper most of the shitlib bias in AI comes from what it was trained on, not guardrails.