Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @sun@shitposter.world
B💣b ❤️‍🔥📿🇺🇸🪆🍀🥋_🎰@smithy@shitposter.world (2026-09-15 07:04:04)
@sun Definitely makes sense -- especially given that maintaining a moat for the big frontier labs seems so difficult and freakishly costly (and we're seeing that in how close open source models can get with fractions of the cost), but I don't think the right response to potentially regulatory capture is to take the opposite PR approach to hand-wave away concerns as some ppl seem to be doing.
---Reply---
Blurry Moon@sun@shitposter.world (2026-09-15 07:06:59)
@smithy right now I treat it similarly in my mind to guns. dangerous but nobody gets to take them away from you. However, I have been growing nuance on this category. There are things where, I think it is empowering for individuals to have it; the risk is real but worth it; freedom of individuals to have some tool basically unrestricted doesn't extrapolate to billion dollar corporations having a "right" to use the same tool on people at industrial scale, they can be regulated.