Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail


Reply to @sun@shitposter.world
of nothing@apropos@fsebugoutzone.org (2026-08-29 06:14:37)
@sun @phnt AI's the most exciting for people who have already reduced other humans to what AI can do. Fire most your programmers and instead have huge teams of brainless code monkeys loosely wrangled by the surviving actual programmers? Then you're absolutely blown away: AI can totally replace these people that you've boxed into being cheap and replaceable!

No surprise that this long downward slope in permitted human performance wasn't only in programming, but it's sad everywhere it happens.
---Reply--- Blurry Moon@sun@shitposter.world (2026-08-29 06:20:55) @apropos @phnt I think that scaling things out, automating, specializing, relying on metrics is what naturally happens as societies grow in size. small artisan commune has the highest and most creativity density but it doesn't scale.

so like to me, what I implied, is that you go down and interact on your close friend/family level where the scale is manageable. there's not a good reason that, because there is pop music for a hundred years now, people stopped getting together and singing on their house porch. you can still do that. you should still do that. AI doesn't wreck that.
Reply