Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail


BπŸ’£b ❀️‍πŸ”₯πŸ“ΏπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸͺ†πŸ€πŸ₯‹_🎰@smithy@shitposter.world (2026-09-15 06:53:43)
See so many arguments formulated this way that aim to assuage concern by reducing what's appears to be a difference in kind/essence to one that's merely different in degree/sophistication -- don't think it really works even if true.
---Attachments---
image: https://media.shitposter.world/shitposter.club/ed/91/33/ed913329aa6d9eeaf8c4dd1cb9f60e59bb6fbfd7eb58bb6c2ca5a2f506eff05d.webp?name=YpMrhEerOAxtmw.webp
Reply

---Replies---
Blurry Moon@sun@shitposter.world (2026-09-15 07:00:02)
@smithy my interpretation is that yes it is powerful and dangerous, but a lot of these things are deliberate mischaracterizations of the events, by the big ai saas companies, to scare people into regulating ai. the end result being, legally kneecap open source models so they protect their revenue stream. feels contradictory but they need you to be unreasonably scared of AI so that you kill off their competitors and they can sell the dangerous tech to the government, who places no restrictions on itself regarding dangerous tech (see: nuclear weapons, gov gets them and you don't)