Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @moth_ball@shitposter.world
バツ子（台風に倒されない@ageha@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu (2026-10-20 18:07:18)
@moth_ball @Merc @lebronjames75 @sun 
if i had to specify somewhere, own observation from raising kids is maybe somewhere more around 1~2 years※. but it's a stepwise change, not going from "on" to "off". give similar reasoning to other animals, don't think my dogs are quite there, but going to protect them as well, and would never kill one, and extend that over-caution to amniotes generally

the real world doesn't have hard lines; wuzzy reasoning is a necessity. if law's getting involved though, would say drop the line at before-birth, as in that range you're balancing the baby's life versus the parent's, and the parent is (except in extreme circumstances? -_-) a person who should take precedent, with restrictions being a danger to that person's health

※ kids go through several fairly clear "stages" that continue after that point, and by studies the point of persistent self with long-term episodic memories is around 5
---Reply---
mothball蛾玉 (*Latest Fad)@moth_ball@shitposter.world (2026-10-20 18:18:19)
@ageha @Merc @lebronjames75 @sun so past term would still be fine if it's not out yet?

---Replies---

バツ子（台風に倒されない@ageha@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu (2026-10-20 18:20:42)
@moth_ball @Merc @lebronjames75 @sun 
yeh; that's still pretty comfortably into the "not-person-yet" range, and pre-birth restrictions inevitably lead to people bleeding out when doctors are scared to act