Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout
Note Detail
Reply to @silverpill@mitra.social
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-08-15 05:28:03)
@sun So, I think the biggest problem with this proposal is that it requires a publicly accessible HTTP server. Is there a good reason for that?
WebXDC, for example, is designed for offline first apps. I am reading WebXDC docs right now and it seems to be compatible with ActivityPub. Maybe we should work on this instead?
---Reply---
also lnkr@lnkr@staging3.plamenu.com (2026-08-15 05:44:48)
@silverpill wait, what the hell, WebXDC over fedi would be (almost) perfect, I need that!
The only friction point I can think of is how are we gonna do window.webxdc.joinRealtimeChannel ? I think Delta uses Iroh for that, and, ehh, maybe, but I'm not immediately on board with that. Maybe we can just ignore it and be fine with async apps?
@sun
Reply
---Replies---
silverpill@silverpill@mitra.social (2026-08-15 06:05:35)
@lnkr @sun Yes, I think we can just ignore joinRealtimeChannel. It is marked as "experimental" in the docs, anyway