Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @sun@shitposter.world
grillchen@grillchen@brot.eus (2026-09-01 07:14:02)
@sun @icedquinn @phnt i read the whole thing. 

what bothers me is i agree with him like 80-90%.  10-20% i think his case isnt bullet proof enough to make a public hit list or mention people. like you cant just sprinkle in a name like louis rossmann. either u are specific or you dont. to much "by association" and rumors or "1 person claimed"  makes this whole thing not trustworthy and not support worthy

also if we are full  woke, than lets be full woke and remove the "little". u cannot make a left hitlist with ableism.
---Reply---
Q.U.I.N.N.@icedquinn@blob.cat (2026-09-01 07:33:55)
@grillchen @phnt @sun modern audience liberals are incredibly bad at logic and reason which is funny because those are kind of cornerstones of liberalism

---Replies---

Q.U.I.N.N.@icedquinn@blob.cat (2026-09-01 07:37:10)
@grillchen @phnt @sun a lot of at least classical liberalism falls out of "it turns out pitchfork mobs can be riled up by charismatic people and, compared to evidence, tend to just kill weirdos more than predators" but this requires actually going through the whole observation to theory to testing cycle

which is the exact process that refuses "some anonymous sources alleged" as credible. if "was near" and "someone said" are valid, then drew is a pedophile full stop. the defenses about that basically involve arguing "well the allegations were weak because its just clips of old forum posts" but that's clearly not the standard.

nicco does a much better job shitting on DHH by actually pointing out his persistent trump posting and weirdly specific citation sources.