Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz
weclome to my website!!
$PAGE_VIEWS
:blobcatnompeach::blobcatautism::blobcatgrimacing:
georiga on telegram
georgia@trashserver.net on xmpp
(response times may vary)
:fedora::debian::kdenew::xfce::sailfishos::lineageos2::fdroid::raspberrypi:
अहं ब्रह्मास्मि त्वं ब्राह्मण असि अयम् आत्मा ब्रह्म सर्वं खल्विदं ब्रह्म
Joined: 2026-07-23 11:24:36
55 notes, 0 following, 0 followers
Reply to @georgia@netzsphaere.xyz
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-28 11:24:56)
@sun @lain also can you ask it "is anandamaya the innermost self aka para brahman or is it the causal body. is it a sheath or is it a self." it will probably mostly cite sankaras bhashya on the brahma sutras which im reading, but i want other opinions.
Reply to @sun@shitposter.world
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-28 11:06:23)
@sun @lain
it really is such a good answer. i did assume three nested bodies, because kosha theory is quite literally that and the koshas overlap with the bodies. but they are states/modifications of brahman produced by one limiting adjunct (ignorance). at least in advaita vedanta...
most of the sanskrit i understand to my surprise. its a bit funny seeing "smrti" mean memory here. because thats also what hindu scriptures besides the vedas that have a human author are called. but it literally means "what is remembered".
i noticed that in some places primary texts are cited (vedantasara in part 1) but in others they arent. part 3 contained my existing assumption (dormant samskaras are the causal, citta a subtle fructification). but part 2 contains something unique, the claim that samskaras (here defined as individual impressions that cluster together to form tendencies) belong to the subtle body, and vasanas (ingrained patterns here) belong to the causal. where can i find this? whats the primary source?
Reply to @sun@shitposter.world
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-28 10:24:48)
@sun @lain holy shit, thanks. this is incredibly informative, although a bit grandiloquent. the yoga vs vedanta distinction was my hunch as well.
the clarification that "Nothing moves between compartments; the description changes with the state of manifestation." is quite helpful. also, chitta not being a storehouse.
my only concern is the addressing of vasanas/samskaras/vrittis. some say the samskara is the seed and the vasana the shoot, which is basically what my previous post said. here it says that the samskaras are the impressions and the vasanas the ingrained pattern. but it seems to be basing it on source texts, which i appreciate.
anyway, ill need to read this a few more times.... and get a kagi subscription... thank you!
Reply to @scathach@stereophonic.space
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-28 09:56:42)
@scathach for this person it was a consequence of an obsession with computer science. it literally became their whole world. but you're right, learning a programming language or the language of math is as lovely as learning a spoken language.
Reply to @georgia@netzsphaere.xyz
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-28 09:54:47)
@lain can you ask kagi please :blobpray:
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-28 09:54:09)
maybe i should just ask an llm my question and ill be surprised. "if chitta is part of the antahkarana of the subtle body, how are samskaras of the causal body stored within it"
Reply to @scathach@stereophonic.space
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-28 09:53:58)
@scathach so, thats bad. reducing the world to information is bad. reducing the mind to a computer is bad.
Reply to @scathach@stereophonic.space
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-28 09:50:06)
@scathach while computer science enables one to think in new ways (https://www.jsoftware.com/papers/tot.html a long time ago i read this essay), computer scientists are very fond of applying their science onto reality itself. thus you get computer touchers saying things like that God is describable by an algorithm. im not making that up, an atheist who views the world as essentially nothing more than information on fedi said that.
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-28 07:26:58)
i enjoy root vegetables a great deal
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-28 06:18:09)
the only reason one should be a computer toucher is to control their own computing experience and make fun little games for personal usage and things. learning about computer "science" is a waste of time if you arent actually applying it (because it sure doesn't help you understand the world and its creatures) and especially if youre selling out your services as a codemonkey
Reply to @cell@shitposter.world
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-28 01:07:42)
@cell i still follow them and they make a post and i check their other posts and they dont follow me :suicide:
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-28 01:05:51)
mfw people ive been mutuals with for over five years unfollow me for hinduposting
Reply to @sun@shitposter.world
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-26 06:45:15)
@sun i think we're talking about different things, being a good person does not equal being a people-pleaser.
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-26 06:37:52)
don't listen to the edgelords, being nice is the coolest thing to be
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-24 14:56:06)
on the bhagas, i HATE when aishvarya is interpreted/translated as superlative wealth instead of superlative lordship/majesty. while being the possessor of all the worlds wealth is a quality of God, avataras are often poor or otherwise ascetic. God doesn't covet wealth or flaunt His wealth.
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-24 09:53:00)
any of you guys used olive for video editing?
Reply to @sun@shitposter.world
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-23 11:49:37)
@sun are you a docker hater because theres this https://github.com/Melting-Cube/supertuxkart-server-docker
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-23 11:46:39)
fedi supertuxkart server needs to happen
Reply to @georgia@netzsphaere.xyz
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-23 11:39:33)
@mischievoustomato @Ghislaine @genmaicha @sun also masturbation is a sin
Reply to @mischievoustomato@tsundere.love
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-23 11:39:12)
@mischievoustomato @Ghislaine @sun @genmaicha I dont masturbate because I was on SSRIs as a child so I never learned how and I dont have a girlfriend because I'm waiting for the One :)
Reply to @mischievoustomato@tsundere.love
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-23 11:36:25)
@mischievoustomato @Ghislaine @sun @genmaicha I'm not I'm very sexually attracted to attractive women
Reply to @genmaicha@stereophonic.space
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-23 11:35:23)
@genmaicha @Ghislaine @sun @mischievoustomato I'm not asexual lol
Reply to @mischievoustomato@tsundere.love
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-23 11:28:45)
@mischievoustomato @Ghislaine @sun I experienced how torturous it was to be away from the one I loved, sure. but I was fine not having sex with her.
Reply to @sun@shitposter.world
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-23 11:26:21)
@sun @Ghislaine comparing forgoing one source of orgasm for an extended period to torture is insanely melodramatic
Reply to @Ghislaine@poa.st
georgia@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz (2026-07-23 11:23:11)
@Ghislaine holy shit men are precious (bad)