Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout
Note Detail
Reply to @hakui@tuusin.misono-ya.info
Blurry Moon@sun@shitposter.world (2026-09-18 11:49:04)
@hakui @adrint 7 also ran in substantially less RAM than Vista, which was an insanely bad regression from XP. tehy were selling brand new Vista laptops that wouldn't even run right out of the box.
---Reply---
cool_boy_mew@coolboymew@shitposter.world (2026-09-18 11:50:24)
@sun @hakui @adrint I worked briefly in a computer shop. Vista was an utter nightmare. Billions hours of updating. Slow ass bloated OS. It was truly terrible
7 was just plain great
Reply
---Replies---
NonPlayableClown@NonPlayableClown@postnstuffds.lol (2026-09-18 11:51:13)
And then they ruined it again with 8 and it never got much better afterwards
Blurry Moon@sun@shitposter.world (2026-09-18 11:54:58)
@coolboymew @adrint @hakui I don't remember the exact ram difference but again I have seen xp run fine in 128MB and Vista required like a GB to run like shit, which is unbelievably bad deterioration. 7 managed to make a bunch of Vista boxes usable again even if they were never gonna get back to 128MB