Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout

Note Detail

Reply to @cjd@pkteerium.xyz
Blurry Moon@sun@shitposter.world (2026-08-20 17:32:16)
@cjd @bonifartius I feel like at this point it's been definitively proven that you don't need reasoning to explain/simulate much of basic human interaction, I mean like with literally no reasoning at all. humans reason, if you add a bit of reasoning then you could fully explain behavior that avoids ridiculous llm hallucination behavior, and I suspect now this is how people really work, I would be very interested in a neurological proof of this though.
---Reply---
ベッサーヴィッサー :verify: :verified: :verified_flashing: @besserwisser@shitposter.world (2026-08-20 18:07:04)
@sun @cjd @bonifartius People suspected we would converge on opinions when exposed to others online in the early days of the internet. This clearly hasn't happened no matter what you think the "correct" opinion on anything is.

---Replies---

Blurry Moon@sun@shitposter.world (2026-08-20 18:12:45)
@besserwisser @bonifartius @cjd I'm not talking about opinions at all, I'm talking about reproducing how people talk about things they learn from for example schooling. I don't have any firsthand knowledge of the middle ages yet I can reproduce "knowledge" about it.