Home | Notifications | New Note | Local | Federated | Search | Logout
Note Detail
Reply to @sun@shitposter.world
バツ子（台風に倒されない@ageha@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu (2026-10-20 18:57:18)
@sun @Merc @lebronjames75 @moth_ball
it's the same kind of iffy as "brain-dead life support". realistically you don't have a person any more, but it's still probably better to avoid a culture of thoughtlessly turning things off at that stage, as it's sort of a moral buffer zone that prevents you from wheeling that back into a less clear zone. deliberation and necessary procedure is good. if mandating brain-dead patients to be kept alive would inevitably kill or maim some other people though, there should definitely never be such a law
---Reply---
バツ子（台風に倒されない@ageha@tomo.airen-no-jikken.icu (2026-10-20 19:01:26)
@sun @Merc @lebronjames75 @moth_ball
by which i mean, that kind of discrimination can make sense in other contexts. but, for abortion in particular, having the law intervene and say "these reasons are justified, and these (unverifiable mental health claims or whatever) are not", you're going to have some of those doctors who are afraid to act and some of those injuries and deaths
Reply
---Replies---
Blurry Moon@sun@shitposter.world (2026-10-20 19:04:33)
@ageha @Merc @lebronjames75 @moth_ball you probably have to acknowledge that many doctors will just coach patients and deal with it